(Connect all of the following to [further] see the real big picture on the filth that has been killing humanity for so long ... as depicted & revealed [in the totality] in the following writings ...)
Al Thompson said (July 2, 2023):
The government is bad religion based on the occult. The results of the actions they take show the depravity of what they do. The chaos in France and the politics in Western nations are a result of the evil of government. It begins with the oaths. The government is a slave system supported by the religions; which in turn, make spiritual slaves of the unsuspecting. I was fooled by these people for years. Notice how none of the religions seem to be opposing the evil of the government; especially the Christians.
Only a focus on virtue and morality will get mankind out of this mess. Don’t look for a masonic government to fix anything. Whatever they do will make it worse. Freemasons are immoral and will destroy everything in their path.
Playing in the “new world order” will always get a bad result and the “new world order” will be destroyed by the natural world order.
https://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2020/12/swear-oath-receive-curse.html
US Debt Has Reached Crisis Proportions (Anthony Migchels)
Eyes Wide Open: Sex, Zionism, Anti-Semitism and Stanley Kubrick
Oct 27, 2024
Written By David Livingstone
Dream Story
Eyes Wide Shut was developed in 1968 after Kubrick read Dream Story (Traumnovelle), by Arthur Schnitzler (1862 – 1931)—a friend of both Sigmund Freud and Theodor Herzl—when Kubrick was looking for a project to follow 2001: A Space Odyssey. Like several other leading Jewish intellectuals, Schnitzler was a member the Pernerstorfer Circle, which contributed to the development of Pan-German, which originally sought to unify all the German-speaking people. From the late nineteenth century, many Pan-Germanist thinkers, since 1891 organized in the Pan-German League, had adopted openly ethnocentric and racist ideologies, and ultimately gave rise to the foreign policy Heim ins Reich pursued by Nazi Germany under Austrian-born Adolf Hitler from 1938, one of the primary factors leading to the outbreak of World War II.
The godfather of the Pan-German movement was Georg von Schönerer (1842 – 1921), who exerted a significant influence on young Hitler.[2] Schönerer’s father, Mathias, a railroad contractor in the employ of the Rothschilds, left him a large fortune. His wife was a great-granddaughter of Rabbi Samuel Löb Kohen, who died at Pohrlitz, South Moravia, in 1832.[3] Like many other Austrian pan-Germans, Schönerer hoped for the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and an Anschluss with Germany. Schönerer’s movement only allowed its members to be Germans and none of the members could have relatives or friends that were Jews or Slavs, and before any member could get married they had to prove “Aryan” descent and have their health checked for any potential defects.[4] Schönerer, who had adopted the swastika as a völkisch symbol, would go on to exercise a great influence on Hitler and the Nazi Party as a whole. Schönerer’s efforts were also reflected in the founding of the Neuen Richard-Wagner-Vereins (“New Richard Wagner Association”) to “free German art from adulteration and Judaization.”[5]
Members of the circle of Engelbert Pernerstorfer (1850 – 1918) were among the charter members of the Leserverein der deutschen Studenten Wiens, which was committed to a combination of socialism and extreme German nationalism, stimulated by Bismarck’s creation of a united German empire, and influenced by the ideas of Schopenhauer, Wagner and Nietzsche. The list of Pernerstorfer’s Jewish supporters included Victor Adler (1852 – 1918), a founding figure of the Social Democratic Workers’ Party of Austria; Heinrich Friedjung (1851 – 1920), who became Austria’s foremost German nationalist historian; the Jewish composer Gustav Mahler (1860 – 1911), a follower of Schönerer influenced by Wagner; Sigmund Freud; Freud’s friends Arthur Schnitzler and Heinrich Braun (1854 – 1927), later a prominent Social-Democrat in Germany. Adler married Braun’s wife Emma, and their son was Friedrich became a close friend of Albert Einstein.[6] One Austrian historian recalled a student meeting where Adler and Friedjung joined others in singing “Deutschland über alles,” while Mahler accompanied them on the piano with “O du Deutschland, ich muss marchieren” (“O you Germany, I must march”).[7]
Members of the Pernerstorfer circle, especially Adler, Pernerstorfer and Friedjung, were the moving spirits, together with von Schönerer, in founding the Deutsche Klub, the political organization formed to carry on the work of the Leseverein after its dissolution, and were the major contributors to the charter of the deutschnational movement. “The charter, which influenced all the mass political movements of modern Austria, centered on demands for radical social and political reform as well as for the satisfaction of extreme German nationalist ambitions.”[8]
It was at this time that Herzl joined the Leseverein. Leon Kellner, a Viennese contemporary and author of an early biography, reported that in December 1880, Herzl was chairman of the Akademische Lesehalle’s social club, which organized beer-drinking evenings featuring German nationalist songs. According to Kellner, “At that time the waves of the German nationalist movement were rising high in this student association; Herzl was one of its most enthusiastic champions.”[9] Schnitzler, a fellow student and friend of Herzl during his university years, described him as a “German-national student and spokesman in the Akademische Lesehalle.”[10]
In a letter to Arthur Schnitzler, Freud confessed “I have gained the impression that you have learned through intuition—although actually as a result of sensitive introspection—everything that I have had to unearth by laborious work on other persons.”[11] Schnitzler’s works were also often controversial for their open description of sexuality. Schnitzler was branded as a pornographer after the release of his play Reigen of 1900, in which ten pairs of characters are shown before and after the sexual act, leading and ending with a prostitute. A diary which Schnitzler kept from the age of 17 until two days before his death, and which runs to almost 8,000 pages, recorded his sexual conquests. He was often in relationships with several women at once and for a period of some years recorded every orgasm. In response to an interviewer who asked him what he thought about the criticism that his works all seemed to be devoted to the same subjects, he replied “I write of love and death. What other subjects are there?”[12]
Young Vienna
The opening to Also sprach Zarathustra, by the German composer Richard Strauss (1864 – 1949), and named after Nietzsche’s book of the same name, became one of the best-known pieces of film music when Kubrick used it in 2001: A Space Odyssey. In 1900, Hugo von Hofmannsthal Strauss, for whom he later wrote libretti for several of his operas. According to Goodrick-Clarke, Frederick Eckstein, founder of the Theosophical Society of Vienna, and a member with his friend Freud of the Pernerstorfer Circle, “cultivated a wide circle of acquaintance amongst the leading thinkers, writers and musicians of Vienna.”[13] Eckstein was among a circle of many artists, musicians, and writers known as Jung Wien (“Young Vienna”), who met in Café Griensteidl and other nearby coffeehouses in the late nineteenth century, along with Hugo von Hofmannsthal, Arthur Schnitzler, Arnold Schoenberg, Alexander Zemlinsky, Hermann Bahr, Rudolf Steiner, Hugo Wolf, and Stefan Zweig. Many of these personalities formed part of what was called belonged to the homoerotic cult known as the George-Kreis (“George-Circle”), founded by Stefan George (1868 – 1933), that included many Jewish artists and intellectuals and associated with Jung Wien, and went on to fundamentally influence the Nazi movement.
In 1889, Strauss left his post with the Bavarian State Opera after being appointed Kapellmeister to Wagner’s patron, Charles Alexander, Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (1818 – 1901), in Weimar. Charles Alexander was the grandson of Karl August, Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (1757 – 1828), a member of the Illuminati, who established what was to become known as Weimar Classicism at his court in Weimar, notably by bringing Johann Wolfgang von Goethe there.[14] Strauss served as the assistant conductor of the Bayreuth Festival during which time he befriended Cosima Wagner who became a close friend. Strauss’ first opera to achieve international fame was Salome, which featured an erotic “Dance of the Seven Veils,” shocked opera audiences from its first appearance. Gustav Mahler could not gain the consent of the Vienna censor to have it performed; therefore it was not given at the Vienna State Opera until 1918. The Austrian premiere was given at the Graz Opera in 1906, with Arnold Schoenberg, Giacomo Puccini, Alban Berg, and Gustav Mahler in the audience.
In 1899, Kraus renounced Judaism, and in the same year he founded his own magazine, Die Fackel (“The Torch”). In its first decade, contributors included such well-known writers and artists as Peter Altenberg, Richard Dehmel, Egon Friedell, Oskar Kokoschka, Else Lasker-Schüler, Adolf Loos, Heinrich Mann, Arnold Schoenberg, August Strindberg, Georg Trakl, Frank Wedekind, Franz Werfel, Houston Stewart Chamberlain and Golden Dawn member Oscar Wilde. Else Lasker-Schüler (1869 – 1945) was a German-Jewish poet and playwright famous for her bohemian lifestyle in Berlin and her poetry. She was in a romantic relationship with Gottfried Benn (1886 – 1956) was a German poet, essayist, and physician, who was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature five times.
Frank Wedekind (1864 – 1918) belonged to the Wedekind family from Horst, which included suspected Illuminatus Georg Christian Gottlieb Wedekind.[15] Wedekind was best known for the “Lulu” cycle, a two-play series, including Erdgeist (“Earth Spirit,” 1895) and Die Büchse der Pandora (“Pandora’s Box,” 1904). Wedekind’s first major play, Frühlings Erwachen (“Spring Awakening,” 1891), caused a scandal because it contained scenes of homoeroticism, implied group male masturbation, actual male masturbation, sado-masochism between a teenage boy and girl, rape and suicide, as well as references to abortion.
Strauss’ Salome used a libretto by Hedwig Lachmann that was a German translation of the French play Salomé by Oscar Wilde. Hedwig was Jewish and the daughter of a cantor, Isaak Lachmann. Hedwig married Gustav Landauer (1870 – 1919), one of the leading theorists on anarchism in Germany.[16] Landauer’s closest friends included Martin Buber, Margarete Sussman, Fritz Mauthner and Auguste Hauschner.[17] As Fritz Mauthner (1849 – 1923) related in his memoirs, his maternal grandfather was a military officer in the sect of Jacob Frank.[18] Though mainly forgotten, Mauthner’s influence can be found in the work of Jorge Luis Borges, Samuel Beckett and James Joyce.[19] The philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, who took several of his ideas from Mauthner, acknowledges him in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1922).
Hedwig’s first love was Richard Dehmel (1863 – 1920), who suggested they live in a “threesome” with his wife Paula Oppenheimer, sister of the Zionist Franz Oppenheimer. Franz and Paula’s father, Dr. Julius Oppenheimer (1827 – 1909), served for many years as a preacher and teacher at the Jewish Reform temple of the Berlin.[20] Dehmel is considered one of the foremost German poets of the pre-World War I era. In 1896, he published the poem “Venus Consolatrix” in the volume of poems Weib und Welt (“Woman and World”), in which he described a mystical sex act with a female figure in which Mary, the mother of Jesus, Venus and Mary Magdalene are merged. As a result, he was tried for obscenity and blasphemy Weib und Welt was ordered to be burned. His poem Verklärte Nacht (“Transfigured Night”) was set to music by Arnold Schoenberg, who was influenced by Wagner.[21]
Dehmel frequented the café Das schwarze Ferkel, as did Franz Evers (1871 – 1947), and pianist and composer Conrad Ansorge, August Strindberg and Moeller van den Bruck.[22] Evers was a member of Wilhelm Hübbe-Schleiden’s German Theosophical Society and afterwards worked as an editor of The Sphinx.[23] Evers shared a studio with another theosophist, the artist Fidus (1868 – 1948), who illustrated his Hohe Lieder and Prana of the Guido von List Society.[24] Fidus also contributed to the early homosexual magazine Der Eigene (“The Unique”), published by Adolf Brand (1874 – 1945), a campaigner for the acceptance of male bisexuality and homosexuality. Brand had joined the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee, founded in Berlin in 1897 by Magnus Hirschfeld (1868 – 1935), and six other gentlemen, to campaign against the legal persecution homosexuality. A prominent Jewish sexologist and homosexual, Hirschfeld coined the term “transvestite.” Contributors to Der Eigene included Evers, Theodor Lessing (1872 – 1933) and Thomas Mann (1875 – 1955). Katharina “Katia” Pringsheim, Mann’s wife, was the granddaughter of Hedwig and Ernst Dohm. By 1900, Fidus was one of the best known painters in Germany, and had come under the influence of writers such as van den Bruck, and the Wandervogel movements. In 1908, Fidus joined the Germanic Faith Community, a religious group led by the painter Ludwig Fahrenkrog (1867 – 1952), which adopted Germanic neopaganism.[25]
In 1894, Dehmel had co-founded Pan magazine, dedicated to Gesamtkunstwerk and providing support to young artists. In 1910, Dehmel’s Pan magazine was revived by Berlin gallery owner and art dealer Paul Cassirer (1871 – 1926), who had worked for the weekly magazine Simplicissimus in Munich, which published the work of writers such as Thomas Mann and Rainer Maria Rilke. Contributors included Hermann Hesse, Gustav Meyrink, Fanny zu Reventlow, Jakob Wassermann, Frank Wedekind, Heinrich Kley, Alfred Kubin, Otto Nückel, Robert Walser, Heinrich Zille, Hugo von Hofmannsthal, Heinrich Mann, Lessie Sachs, and Erich Kästner. Cassirer was the first to exhibit Manet, Cezanne, Van Gogh and Gauguin in Germany, and he championed the work of the Impressionists’ German counterparts, like painter Max Liebermann. The group, along with Barlach, Kandinsky, and Max Beckmann eventually made up the core of the avant-garde formation, the Berlin Secession, an art movement established in 1898, who rejected traditional art styles then advanced by both academia and officials, and created the foundation of Modernism.[26]
In 1904, Wedekind was supported by Kraus to make possible the staging in Vienna of his controversial play Pandora’s Box. The open depiction of sexuality and violence in these plays, including lesbianism and an encounter with Jack the Ripper—a role that Wedekind played in the original production—pushed the boundaries of what was considered acceptable on the stage at the time. In Franziska (1910), the title character, a young girl, initiates a Faustian pact with the Devil, selling her soul for the knowledge of what it is like to live life as a man. A performance of Wedekind’s Spring’s Awakening was attended by Hitler and his friend Kubizek in Vienna.[27]
Anti-Bolshevik League
The Anti-Bolshevik League in 1918 was founded by Eduard Stadtler (1886 – 1945) had begun advocating the creation of a “national socialist” dictatorship.[32] The circle around Stadtler and Heinrich von Gleichen (1882 – 1959) operated a magazine called Das Gewissen (“The Conscience”), which included Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, who would go on to become a major figure in the German Conservative Revolution and coin the term “Third Reich.”[33] Heinrich von Gleichen was a cousin of Friedrich Schiller’s last great-grandson, the writer Alexander von Gleichen-Rußwurm, whom he provided with a life annuity until old age. Gleichen played a leading role in the Kulturbund, founded in 1915 and supported by the Reich government, which included, among others, Max Planck, Walter Rathenau and Max Liebermann of the Berlin Secession movement of artists associated with Richard Dehmel’s Pan magazine.[34]
During World War I, Walter Rathenau (1867 – 1922), who was one of Germany’s leading industrialists in the late German Empire, played a key role in the organization of the German war economy, and would become an influential figure in the politics of the Weimar Republic. According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, after 1880, the Gesellschaft der Freunde (“Society of Friends”)—founded by leading members of the Haskalah, around Moses Mendelssohn—became an organization where leading Jewish bankers, entrepreneurs, merchants, and managers met, including the Mendelssohns, Liebermanns, Ullsteins, Mosses, Rathenaus, and Bleichroeders.[35] On January 10, 1919, around fifty leading representatives of the German industry, commerce and banking, many of them members of the Gesellschaft der Freunde, met and set up an Anti-Bolshevik Fund. Among the invited participants were industry association head Hugo Stinnes, Albert Vögler, Carl Friedrich von Siemens, Otto Henrich of Siemens-Schuckert-Werke, Ernst von Borsig, Felix Deutsch from AEG, Arthur Salomonsohn from Disconto-Society.[36] Felix Deutsch (1858 – 1928) was a German-Jewish businessman and industrial manager who is considered a co-founder of AEG, one of the world’s largest electrical companies. Arthur Salomonsohn (1859 – 1930) was a German-Jewish banker. Deutsch, Salomonsohn and von Siemens were members of the Gesellschaft der Freunde. At the beginning of the Weimar Republic, Salomonsohn supported Hugo Stinnes and Albert Vögler in their projects to reorganize and vertically concentrate German industry through the formation of interest groups.[37]
Stadtler also received funds from Friedrich Naumann (1860 – 1919), originally a follower of the conservative-clerical and antisemitic Berlin movement led by Adolf Stoecker, who was also involved in the Antisemitenpetition.[38] Naumann, however, later distanced himself from Stoecker’s conservatism and antisemitism, and became interested in the social theories advocated by his friend Max Weber (1864 – 1920), one of the central figures in the development of sociology. Weber classified Jewish people as having been a “pariah people,” which meant that they were separated from the society that contained them.[39]
Forte Kreis
The group influenced Bosnian-Serb mystic Dimitrije Mitrinovic (1887 – 1953), who identified Gutkind among the bearers of revelations, along with Rudolf Steiner, Helena Blavatsky and Vladimir Solovyov, and promoted his work in Orage’s The New Age.[43] While at Munich University, Mitrinovic was linked with Theosophist Wassily Kandinsky. Along with Franz Marc (1880 – 1916)—a friend of Karl Wolfskehl of the Cosmic Circle and the George-Kreis—Kandinsky was a co-founder of the editorial group Der Blaue Reiter, which opened its first exhibition in Munich in 1911. Along with a number of prominent Fabians, Mitrinovic was a contributor to the magazine The New Age, which became one of the first places in England in which Freud’s ideas were discussed before World War I. The magazine’s editor, Alfred Richard Orage (1873 –1934), was a friend of Aleister Crowley, and also personally knew George Bernard Shaw, Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead. Orage also worked with George Gurdjieff after he had been recommended to him by Gurdjieff’s leading student, P.D. Ouspensky.[44] Under the editorship of Orage, The New Age according to a Brown University press release, “helped to shape modernism in literature and the arts from 1907 to 1922.”[45] The circle of The New Age contributors widely influential, and included Aleister Crowley, Ananda Coomaraswamy, Havelock Ellis, Filippo Marinetti, H.G. Wells, Florence Farr, George Bernard Shaw, Marmaduke Pikthall, C.H. Douglas, Hilaire Belloc and Ezra Pound.
Mitrinovic founded the Adler’s Society (the English Branch of the International Society for Individual Psychology), with Hungarian-born Jew, Alfred Adler, who was a first cousin of Victor Adler of the Pernerstorfer Circle and who apparently worked with Aleister Crowley. Adler was also well-acquainted with Dr. Leopold Thoma, one of the closest collaborators of Erik Jan Hanussen, Hitler’s Jewish clairvoyant.[46] Adler had also been assisted in his work with his patients by Aleister Crowley.[47] In collaboration with Freud and a small group of Freud’s colleagues, Adler was among the co-founders of the psychoanalytic movement and a core member of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. To Freud, Adler was “the only personality there.”[48] Adler is considered, along with Freud and Jung, to be one of the three founding figures of depth psychology, which emphasizes the unconscious and psychodynamics, and thus to be one of the three great psychologist/philosophers of the twentieth century.
Walter Rathenau, a member of the Kulturbund, was an early proponent of the concept of the “United States of Europe.” Rathenau had become close friends with the businessman Bernhard Dernburg, who was appointed Germany’s first colonial secretary in May 1907. Dernburg, in close cooperation with Berlin’s Ambassador Count Johann, would later assume control of the German Information Bureau on Broadway, which fronted for a secretive Propaganda Kabinett that counted George Sylverster Viereck, Hugo Münsterberg, Hanns Heinz Ewers, who were all intimately acquainted with Aleister Crowley.[49] Already before the war, Rathenau made the case for the establishment of a Central European customs union, which became a reality in 1957 as the European Economic Community. After the war, Rathenau pursued the normalization of the relationship between Germany and the Soviet Union and the allied victorious powers as well as a settlement with Soviet Russia, and insisted that Germany fulfil its obligations under the Treaty of Versailles.
Perceiving his actions to be evidence of the “power of international Jewry,” Rathenau was assassinated by members of the Organisation Consul (OC), composed of former participants in the Kapp Putsch.”[50] Members of the ultra-nationalist Organisation Consul (OC), composed of former Kapp Putsch conspirators, were involved in the assassination of Walter Rathenau in 1922. The OC grew out of the ranks of Marine Brigade Ehrhardt, a Freikorps unit formed by Hermann Ehrhardt, after the failure of the Kapp Putsch. The OC played a significant role in the formation of the Nazi Sturmabteilung (SA) in 1921. His assassins explicitly cited Rathenau’s membership in the “three hundred Elders of Zion” as justification for the killing.[51] Rathenau had famously said in a 1909 in Neue Freie Presse: “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, guide the economic destinies of the Continent and seek their successors from their own milieu.” By 1912, Theodor Fritsch considered Rathenau’s comment as an “open confession of indubitable Jewish hegemony” and as proof that Rathenau was the “secret Kaiser of Germany.”[52]
Merhavia
Max Bodenheimer, who formed the original leadership of the Zionist Federation of Germany (ZVfD) with Franz Oppenheimer, explains Jay Ticker, “was the chief advocate of the pro-German policy for the Zionist movement.”[53] Bodenheimer had been president from its foundation in 1897 until 1910, and when the war began, he served as head of the Jewish National Fund. Bodenheimer and Oppenheimer, along with several other Zionists, travelled to the Eastern Front, where they were received by Aufbau member General Ludendorff and later also by Field-Marshal von Hindenburg. Already in the late autumn of 1914, Ludendorff, in his capacity as general Chief of Staff of the Eastern Command of the Imperial Armies, issued an appeal in the Yiddish language “to my dear Jews in Poland.”[54] Bodenheimer wrote about the meeting that Ludendorff:
…showed lively interest in our endeavors. He welcomed our intention to inform the Jewish population of the political situation and of the prospect of an improvement in their position in the case of the axis powers achieving victory. To him we proposed sending our trustworthy men into the occupied territory so that understanding between the military and the Jews would be facilitated.[55]
When Herzl asked him to help work on the Jewish colonization of Palestine, Oppenheimer submitted a plan to the Zionist Congress of 1903. Oppenheimer, Zelig Soskin (1872–1959) and Otto Warburg (1859 – 1938), a cousin of the German-based Warburgs, received formal permission and funding from the World Zionist Organization (WZO) to begin planning the colonization of Palestine. Soskin wrote in the proposal: “We need only refer to how the Aryan people colonize. I refer to the Germans in the African colonies, etc.”[56] Based on that plan, Oppenheimer founded the agricultural cooperative Merhavia in 1911, south of Nazareth.[57] In 1914, Oppenheimer was joined by Loe Motzkin (1867 – 1933) and Theodor Herzl’s associate Max Bodenheimer, to create a German Committee for Freeing of Russian Jews, which was supported by the German Empire.[58] Motzkin participated in the First Zionist Congress in 1897 and became close to Herzl, who sent him on a mission to Palestine to investigate the problems of the Jewish community. Motzkin proceeded to establish a Jewish delegation to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 to represent the interests of Jews across Europe. This committee became a permanent institution under the League of Nations.[59]
The Merhavia co-operative was founded with the assistance of Arthur Ruppin (1876 – 1943), a friend of Chaim Weizmann, who joined the Zionist Organization (ZO, the future World Zionist Organization, WZO) in 1905. At the Zionist Congress of 1907 in Hague, Otto Warburg recommended nominating Ruppin to make a pilot study of the possibilities for colonization in Palestine. He was sent by David Wolffsohn, the President of the ZO, to study the condition of the Yishuv, the Jewish community in Palestine, then under Ottoman control. After eleven weeks, Ruppin presented a concrete plan to the Restricted Executive Committee (REC), who decided to establish a Palestine Office (PO), that would function as the official representation of the Zionist movement in Palestine. Ruppin was appointed its director. Following Ruppin’s ideas, Warburg suggested the establishment of the Palestine Land Development Company (PLDC), which the board of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) approved.[60] The PLDC worked to purchasing land, to train Jews in agricultural pursuits, and to establish Jewish agricultural settlements in Palestine. Ruppin’s work made Practical Zionism possible and shaped the direction of the Second Aliya, the last wave of Jewish immigration to Palestine before World War I.
Ruppin’s main intellectual influences included Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Nietzsche and Gustav Wyneken.[61] Inspired by works of anti-Semitic thinkers, including some Nazis, Ruppin believed that the realization of Zionism depended on the “racial purity” of Jews.[62] For Ruppin, what Zionism required was to weed out inferior, “semitic” racial elements among Ostjuden, to select only those biologically adapted to life in Palestine. To that end, he drew up a hierarchy of Jewish racial types which distinguished Ashkenazi—allegedly not Semitic but Aryans descended from Hittites and Amorites—from the inferior Bedouin-related Sephardim.[63] Ruppin drew such ideas from Heinrich Himmler’s mentor, Hans F.K. Günther (1891 – 1968), also known as Rassenpapst (“Race Pope”), who greatly influenced Nazism.[64]
Hope and Tragedy
The ideas of Gustav Wyneken (1875 – 1964), one of leaders of the German youth movement, also influenced Hashomer Hatzair. The Wandervogel, with its precursor the Bündische Jugend, together are referred to as the German Youth Movement, is often regarded as a part of the Germany Conservative Revolution.[66] Wyneken’s books were published by Eugen Diederichs, who was an avid devotee of Nietzsche, and saw the Youth Movement as producing a new culture for the Nietzschean Übermensch.[67] In 1920, Wyneken was ousted from the Wickersdorf Free School Community which he had founded in Thuringia, after being convicted of homosexual contact with students.[68]
Wyneken was defended by his friend Hans Blüher (1888 – 1955), listed by Armin Mohler as an early exponent of the German Conservative Revolution.[69] Blüher earned fame with the publication in 1912 of a trilogy, whose third volume, titled “The Wandervogel Youth Movement as an Erotic Phenomenon,” outraged the movement leaders. In order to facilitate the acceptance of his interpretations, Blüher sought professional support: “For this purpose, I appropriately approached two particularly distinguished authorities in the field of sexual science: Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, the foremost expert on the subject matter, in Berlin, and Prof. Dr. Sigmund Freud, the greatest sexual theorist, in Vienna.” His interpretation was “recognized and deemed good” by both of them, which Hirschfeld even agreeing to provide a foreword to third volume.[70]
Hashomer Hatzair’s encounter with Eros, the Greek god of love and sex, began through the influence of Siegfried Bernfeld (1892 – 1953), who had studied psychoanalysis at the University of Vienna. While still a student, Bernfeld was involved in the psychoanalytical movement, and later became an important member of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. During the war years and the 1920s, he had access to the most prestigious intellectual circles in Vienna, frequently visiting Freud’s home, where he participated in a study group with Anna Freud, who was reportedly in love with him.[71] Bernfeld was active in the Psychoanalytic Society and, in the early 1920s, was Buber's secretary and assistant. Bernfeld was also active in the German movement for educational reform inspired by Wyneken, and edited and published Der Anfang.
The members of Bitania Ilit, the community founded by Hashomer Hatzair in Palestine, hung on the wall of their dining hall a reproduction of Plato’s Symposium—which featured panegyrics on Eros and the virtues of pederasty—painted by Anselm Feuerbach, the nephew of Ludwig Feuerbach.[72] Meir Yaari (1897 – 1987), one of the early leaders of Hashomer Hatzair, envisioned the eda as a Männerbund:
Our erotic attachment bursts out of our unified soul, spreading everywhere and covering all—the land, work, the landscape from which come color, symbol, and piety. It tears our souls open and fuses us with the entire cosmos.[73]
Schnitzler’s works were called “Jewish filth” by Hitler and were banned by the Nazis in Austria and Germany. In 1933, when Goebbels organized book burnings in Berlin and other cities, Schnitzler’s works were thrown into flames along with those of other Jews, including Einstein, Marx, Kafka, Freud and Stefan Zweig.[76] Though he was born Jewish, Kubrick, in 1958, married Christian Harlan, the niece of Nazi film-maker Veit Harlan (1899 – 1964), director of Jud Süß (“Jew Sweet”), considered one of the most antisemitic films of all time. Jud Süß was based on a novel written in 1921–1922, published 1925, which was well received internationally, by Lion Feuchtwanger (1884 – 1958), a German Jewish novelist and playwright denounced by the Nazis. A prominent figure in the literary world of Weimar Germany, Feuchtwanger influenced contemporaries including playwright Bertolt Brecht. The novel is the story of Joseph Süß Oppenheimer (1698? – 1738), a German Jewish banker and court Jew for Charles Alexander, Duke of Württemberg in Stuttgart (1684 – 1737), who was executed by the Duke of Württemberg-Neuenstadt, and whose decaying corpse had been suspended in an iron cage by Stuttgart’s Prag gallows for six years.
Charles Alexander’s son, Charles Eugene, Duke of Württemberg (1728 – 1793), was a patron of Friedrich Schiller. Although no official membership list of the Illuminati includes his name, Schiller was surrounded by members of the order all his life, including Goethe, Herder, Voigt, and J.C. Bode, who with Moses Mendelssohn was a mutual friend of Lessing, and who succeeded Weishaupt as the leader of the order in 1784 and would contribute to instigating the French Revolution on his trip to Paris in 1787. Charles Eugene’s sister, Duchess Auguste, married Karl Anselm of Thurn and Taxis, Head of the Princely House of Thurn and Taxis, whose preferred banker was Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild dynasty.
In 1932, Goebbels published a pamphlet to refute certain allegations that his grandmother was Jewish.[77] Gregor Strasser, for many years second only to Hitler in the Nazi Party, had asserted that Goebbels was of Jewish ancestry, citing the club foot as proof.[78] After attending the lectures at University of Heidelberg, Goebbels sent a letter to Professor Max Freiherr von Waldberg, with whom he graduated, reiterating how much he owed to his Jewish professor Friedrich Gundolf, a member of the George-Kreis.[79] In the summer of 1922, he began a love affair with Else Janke, a schoolteacher. After she revealed to him that she was half-Jewish, according to Goebbels the “enchantment [was] ruined.”[80] Nevertheless, he continued to see her on and off until 1927.[81]
A prominent member of the Nazi Party, Goebbels’s wife Magda was a close ally, companion and political supporter of Adolf Hitler. When she was eight-years-old, Magda’s mother married Jewish businessman and leather-goods magnate Richard Friedländer and moved with him to Brussels in 1908. Friedländer’s residency card, found in Berlin archives, stated that Magda was his biological daughter.[82] Friedländer was later killed in the Buchenwald concentration camp. Before marrying Goebbels, Magda had had a love affair with Chaim Arlosoroff, a protegee of Arthur Ruppin and a close friend of Chaim Weizmann.[83] Arlosoroff became a Socialist Zionist leader of the Yishuv during the British Mandate for Palestine, prior to the establishment of Israel, and Head of the Political Department of the Jewish Agency.
In 1940, Goebbels commissioned Harlan to make film-version of Jud Süß, based in part on Feuchtwanger’s novel. In Feuchtwanger’s novel, it is Süss Oppenheimer’s daughter who is raped and killed by the Duke of Württemberg. In Harlan’s film, it is Süss who infiltrates and corrupts the gentile community, dupes the innocent Duke, and rapes a pure Christian woman, who drowns herself in shame. To the cries of “Kill the jew!” from the gathered crowd, Süss is hanged in the climactic scene.
The film starred Werner Krauss (1884 – 1959), who dominated the German theatre and cinema of the early twentieth century. Krauss initially gained minor and secondary roles like King Claudius in Shakespeare’s Hamlet or Mephistopheles in Goethe’s Faust. Committed to playing sinister roles, he became a worldwide sensation for his demonic portrayal of the titular character in Robert Wiene’s film The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920). Considered a milestone of German Expressionist cinema, the film tells the story of an insane hypnotist, played by Krauss, who uses a mind-controlled somnambulist to commit murders. The script was written by two Jewish writers, Hans Janowitz (1890 – 1954) and Carl Mayer (1894 – 1944).
Mayer worked with Béla Balázs (1884 – 1949) on the script for Das Blaue Licht (“The Blue Light”), a 1932 film version of the witch Junta directed by Hitler’s favorite filmmaker, Leni Riefenstahl. Balázs was a moving force in the Sonntagskreis (“Sunday Circle”), the intellectual discussion group which he founded in the autumn of 1915, together with the Hungarian Marxist philosopher Georg Lukács (1885 – 1971), who was an important influence on the Frankfurt School. Lukács befriended Thomas Mann who later based the character of the Jewish Jesuit Naphta on Lukács in his novel The Magic Mountain. Shortly after, in 1933, Mayer moved to London to escape the Nazi regime. Riefenstahl later removed Balázs’s and Mayer’s names from the film credits because they were Jewish.
In 1922, Harlan had married Dora Gerson, a Jewish-German cabaret singer and stage and motion picture actress of the silent film era. They divorced in 1924. By 1933, when the Nazi Party came to power in Germany, Gerson’s career dramatically restricted. Blacklisted from performing in “Aryan” films, Gerson began recording music for a small Jewish record company. She also began recording in the Yiddish language during this time, and the 1936 song Der Rebe Hot Geheysn Freylekh Zayn became highly regarded by the Jews of Europe in the 1930s. In 1938, after relocating with relatives to the Netherlands, she dubbed the voice of the Evil Queen in the German language film release of the 1937 Walt Disney film Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. Gerson later was murdered at Auschwitz with her family.
Lolita
Although it polarized critics for its controversial depictions of child sexual abuse, Kubrick’s adaptation of the novel into film in 1962 was nominated at the Academy Awards for Best Adapted Screenplay. Kubrick’s film was based on the novel by Vladimir Nabokov, published by Maurice Girodias’ Olympia Press, which published a mix of erotic fiction and avant-garde literary fiction. Girodias had been involved in the synarchist circles of Postel du Mas, the reputed author of the Synarchist Pact with Aldous Huxley’s associate, Jean Coutrot, leader of the Mouvement Synarchique d’Empire (MSE). Girodias first became intrigued at lectures by Jiddu Krishnamurti at the Theosophical Society in 1935, where Postel du Mas and Jeanne Canudo led a group dressed as Templar knights wearing red capes and riding boots.[84]
Barnett’s first mind control perpetrator, Nazi Doctor, Leonas Petrauskas, had connections to Dr. Harry Bailey, of the notorious Chelmsford private hospital, which has reported links to Dr. Ewan Cameron’s experiments in Canada.[89] Bailey, like most Australian doctors connected to MK-Ultra, graduated from the University of Sydney, and in 1954 he received a World Health Organization fellowship to study the methods of Ewen Cameron and William Sargant. In 2009, BBC Radio 4 broadcast a program by James Maw entitled Revealing the Mind Bender General, about Sargant’s Sleep Room treatments at St. Thomas’ Hospital. Among the interviewees were his one-time registrar David Owen, and a number of patients from St Thomas’ as well as a survivor of human experimentation at the Porton Down—the site of one of the UK’s most secretive and controversial military research facilities—who testified that their lives had been shattered by Sargant’s treatments.
Sargant was a close friend of Robert Graves, who is known for this analysis and interpretations of the Greek myths, his memoir of his early life, and I, Claudius and Claudius the God, which were turned into a very popular BBC television series shown in both Britain and United States in the 1970s. Graves was also a close friend at Oxford of T.E. Lawrence “of Arabia.” Graves was the author of The White Goddess, a key book for modern Pagans and Wiccans, in which he proposes the existence of a European deity, inspired and represented by the phases of the moon, and which is the origin of the goddesses of various European and pagan mythologies. Towards the end of the 1950s, Idries Shah, the author of The Sufis, established contact with Wiccan circles in London and became secretary to Gerald Gardner, and met Graves in 1961. Graves helped Sargant edit Battle for the Mind, one of the first books on the psychology of “brainwashing,” and which lauded by Aldous Huxley.
Sargant had a long history of working closely with Eliot Slater, who had been appointed medical officer at Maudsley Hospital in London, the staging ground for MK-Ultra in Europe and Africa, perhaps Australia as well. The IoP was originally a competitor to the notorious Tavistock clinic until it came under Tavistock control when Dr. John Rawlings Rees and Eric Trist, started operating out of there.[90] The Maudsley maintained its links with Germany, taking on both pro-Nazis and Jewish emigres through fellowships provided by the Commonwealth Fund and, after 1935, large scale funds from the American Rockefeller Foundation. In 1934, Slater was awarded a Rockefeller Foundation travelling fellowship, which he used to study psychiatric genetics under Bruno Schulz at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Munich.[91] Slater continued to visit Munich through the 1930s and contributed to academic festivities honoring Nazi eugenicist Ernst Rudin.[92] Julian Huxley later promoted Slater’s work at the Maudsley.[93] In 1936, Julian Huxley’s friend Julian Treveleyan, took part in a mescaline study at Maudsley.[94]
Operating later out of the IoP was Dr. Hans J. Eysenck, the racist psychologist involved with Alain de Benoist’s GRECE, the chief organization of the French Nouvelle Droite. In the 1960s, Eysenck was Director of MK-Ultra Subproject 111. The chief of the CIA’s Chemical Branch, responsible for psychology research as well as drugs and poisons, noted that, “Eysenck is one of the most skillful and productive psychologists on the international scene today and a grant to him would add prestige of the (Human Ecology Society). “This project will also be in accordance with the plan of developing (the Society) as a worldwide organization.”[95]
In 1963, Bailey also founded the Chelmsford Private Hospital, which used hypnotic drugs, ECT and DST, mostly experimentally and without informed consent. All doctors at Chelmsford, including Bailey, had previously been involved with work at the Crown Street Hospital for Women in Sydney. There they were involved in a eugenics program of forced adoption away from “unfit” mothers, where Bailey had helped to introduce methods of using hypnotic drugs to make them comply. He directly ordered the abortion of twin fetuses without a woman’s consent while she was under the influence of these drugs. 64% of unwed mothers had their babies taken at Crown Street.[99] At Chelmsford that he would seduce vulnerable patients, as young as 18, then encourage the patients into signing their wills over to him. This was the case with Sharon Hamilton, a Chelmsford victim, whose $100,000 estate went straight to Bailey after her suicide.[100] Bailey ultimately ended the lives of at least 28 patients at Chelmsford with his ECT, DST and drug experiments. He eventually committed suicide by overdosing on barbiturates in 1985, while under investigation.[101]
Barnett tells how Petrauskas was instrumental in introducing her to Antony Kidman, who attended Sydney University at the same time as Petrauskas.[102] Kidman, was also studying psychology at Sydney during Orne’s experiment and lectureship.[103] He would go on to study at the University of Pennsylvania, but instead with Dr. Aaron Tim Beck, the father of Clinical Psychology and an advisory board member of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. It was there Kidman became a longtime colleague of Dr. Martin Seligman, a man whose career research has been made the core of the CIA’s torture program.[104] Kidman returned to Australia in 1972 after years of work at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, Washington D.C., in the Laboratory of Preclinical Pharmacology, which was involved with LSD research and served as a hub of the Scottish Rite Schizophrenia Research Program. Both Prof. Jacqueline Goodnow, who specialized in Personality Research and Child Psychology, and John Gittinger had also performed research at the hospital. A year later, Sidney Gottleib fled to Australia and disappeared without a trace. Jacqueline was married to Dr. Robert E. Goodnow, a CIA psychologist who founded Psychological Assessments Associates (PAA) with Gittinger. As President of PAA, Goodnow made huge contributions to the hidden research of Gittinger’s “Personality Assessment System.”[105]
In Batman Forever (1995), produced by Tim Burton and directed by Joel Schumacher, Nicole Kidman plaid Dr. Chase Meridian, a psychologist specializing in multiple personality disorders and recovering repressed memories. She diagnoses Two Face (Tommy Lee Jones) and Riddles (Jim Carrey” as suffering from the condition, and suggests to Bruce Wayne that he may be suffering the same, a symptom that she herself seems to suffer as she becomes attracted to Batman and Wayne in different ways. When Meridian and Batman meet, they discuss the option of reasoning with Two Face to release innocent hostages, but Meridian concludes that it’s futile, as “he will slaughter them without thinking twice.” Batman begins to explain that a “trauma strong enough to create an alternative personality leaves the victim…,” and Meridian interrupts to finish by saying “…in a world where normal rules of right and wrong no longer apply.”
Liz Mullinar, casting director in the Australian film industry, who is credited with Nicole’s international success, is the founder of Heal for Life, Australia’s leading Satanic Ritual Abuse clinic. Mullinar claims to have been a victim of a pedophile ring and alleges her father, the Reverend Stephan Hopkinson, a notable and highly respected figure in the UK, was responsible. Mullinar left film and television industry to form the Australian Association for Recovered Memories in 1995. In 1997, she co-founded the Mayumarri Healing Centre (now Heal For Life Foundation) with husband Rodney Phillips to provide a safe location where survivors of child abuse could recover from their ordeal. In 1999, Nicole Kidman starred in Stanley Kubrick’s “Eyes Wide Shut,” with Scientologist Tom Cruise, which depicts an elite sex-cult that engages in Satanic rituals, filmed at Mentmore Towers, a nineteenth-century English country house built for the Rothschild family.
[1] Clyde Lewis. “Good Luck, Mr. Gorsky!” Groundzeromedia.org. Retrieved http://archives.groundzeromedia.org/dis/gorsky/gorsky.html
[2] Bojoan Bujic. “Language and Identity: Wagner and Some Dilemmas of Early Modernism.” The Musical Times 155, no. 1926 (2014), p. 30. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24615702
[3] Joseph Jacobs & S. Mannheimer. “Schönerer, Georg von.” Jewish Encyclopedia (1906).
[4] Brigitte Hamann. Hitler’s Vienna: A Portrait of the Tyrant as a Young Man (Tauris Parke Paperbacks, 2010), p. 244.
[5] Ibid., p. 48.
[6] Galison, Peter. “Assassin of Relativity (Lecture).” Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlONXXn9_QI
[7] William J. McGrath. “Student Radicalism in Vienna.” Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 2, No. 3, Education and Social Structure (July, 1967), p. 183.
[8] Cited in William J. McGrath. “Student Radicalism in Vienna,” p. 198.
[9] Jacques Kornberg. Theodor Herzl: From Assimilation to Zionism (Indiana University Press, 1993), p. 40.
[10] Cited in Kornberg. Theodor Herzl, p. 41.
[11] Sir David Hare. “Schnitzler’s hidden manuscripts explored.” Research Horizon, Issue 3 (April 2007). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20100315122800/http://www.research-horizons.cam.ac.uk/features/schnitzler-s-hidden-manuscripts-explored.aspx
[12] Nicholas Parsons. Vienna: A Cultural History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
[13] Goodrick-Clarke. Occult Roots of Nazism, p. 28.
[14] Stefanie Kellner. “Die freiheitliche Geisteshaltung der Ernestiner prägte Europa.” Monumente (February 2016), pp. 9–16. Retrieved from http://www.monumente-online.de/de/ausgaben/2016/1/ernestiner-herrscherhaus.php#.VsWv9k32bGg
[15] Melanson. Perfectibilists.
[16] Patrick Jordan. “A Life of Dialogue: Martin’s Buber’s Path to a Believing Humanism.” Commonweal (June 8, 2020). Retrieved from https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/life-dialogue
[17] Cedric Cohen-Skalli & Libera Pisano. “Farewell to Revolution! Gustav Landauer’s Death and the Funerary Shaping of His Legacy.” The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 28: 2 (2020), p. 198.
[18] Fritz Mauthner. Erinnerungen (München: Georg Müller, 1918), p. 111.
[19] Silvia Dapía. Die Rezeption der Sprachkritik Fritz Mauthners im Werk von Jorge Luis Borges (Cologne, Weimar: Böhlau, 1993); Linda Ben-Zvi. “Samuel Beckett, Fritz Mauthner and the Limits of Language.” PMLA, 95: 2 (1980), pp. 183–200; Maria Kager. “James Joyce and Fritz Mauthner: Multilingual Liberators of Language.” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 93:1 (2018), pp. 39–47.
[20] Claudia Willms. Liberale Erziehung im Milieu (Bohlau Verlag, 2018), pp. 78–91.
[21] Gary D. Stark. Banned in Berlin: Literary Censorship in Imperial Germany, 1871–1918 (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2009), p. 204.
[22] Alain de Benoist. “Arthur Moeller van den Bruck.” Retrieved from https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/alaindebenoist/pdf/arthur_moeller_van_den_bruck.pdf
[23] Marina Schuster. Fidus. In Uwe Puschner, Walter Schmitz & Justus H. Ulbricht (eds.), Handbuch zur „Völkischen Bewegung“ 1871–1918 (Munich: Saur, 1996), p. 904.
[24] G. L. Mosse. “The Mystical Origins of National Socialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 22: 1 (1961), p. 87.
[25] Carrie B. Dohe. Jung’s Wandering Archetype: Race and religion in analytical psychology (London and New York: Routledge, 2016), p. 111.
[26] Emily D. Bilski. Berlin Metropolis: Jews and the New Culture, 1890–1918 (New York: University of California Press, 1999), pp. 51–53.
[27] Hamann. Hitler’s Vienna, pp. 75.
[28] Peter Mentzel. “Franz Oppenheimer (March 30, 1864).” Online Liberty Library. Retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/franz-oppenheimer-birthday-biography-march-1864
[29] Gerald D. Feldman. Hugo Stinnes. Biographie eines Industriellen 1870–1924 (München: Beck, 1998), p. 553
[30] Etan Bloom. Arthur Ruppin and the Production of Pre-Israeli Culture (Leiden: Brill, 2011), p. 144.
[31] Ibid.
[32] Gerald D. Feldman. Army, industry, and labor in Germany, 1914-1918 (Providence, Rhode Island, US; Oxon, England, UK: Berg Publishers, Inc., 1992), p. 529.
[33] Hans-Joachim Schwierskott. Arthur Moeller van den Bruck und der revolutionäre Nationalismus in der Weimarer Republik (Göttingen: Musterschmidt, 1962).
[34] Dirk Stegmann. “Die deutsche Inlandspropaganda 1917/18.” In: Militärgeschichtliche Mitteilungen 2/72, p. 78 f. m. Anm. 25.
[35] Herman Rosenthal, Peter Wiernik. “HASKALAH.” Jewish Encyclopedia.
[36] Jörg-R. Mettke. “Das Große Schmieren.” Der Spiegel (December 3, 1984). Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13510803.html
[37] Martin L. Müller. “Salomonsohn, Arthur Moritz.” In Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB). Band 22, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005), p. 395 f.
[38] Eduard Stadtler. Erinnerungen. Als Antibolschewist 1918–1919 (Düsseldorf: Neuer Zeitverlag, 1935).
[39] Dirk Kaesler. Max Weber: An Introduction to His Life and Work. Translated by Hurd, Philippa (University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 127.
[40] Marcel Poorthuis. “The Forte Kreis: an Attempt to Spiritual Leadership over Europe.” Religion and Theology: A Journal of Contemporary Religous Discourse (2017), p. 51.
[41] Birgit Neumann & Jürgen Reulecke. Deutsch-Jüdische Jugendliche im “Zeitalter der Jugend” (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010), p. 38; Poorthuis. “The Forte Kreis,” p. 41.
[42] Guido van Hengel. “World Conquest Through Heroic Love : How the Forte-Kreis Inspired Dimitrije Mitrinović.” In Slobodan G. Markovich (ed.). A Reformer of Mankind : Dimitrije Mitrinovic Between Cultural Utopianism and Social Activism (Zepter Book World, 2023), p. 185.
[43] Jason Ā. Josephson-Storm. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences (University of Chicago Press, 2017), p. 230.
[44] Peter Washington. Madame Blavatsky’s baboon: a history of the mystics, mediums, and misfits who brought spiritualism to America (Schocken Books, 1995) p. 170.
[45] “Modernist Journals Project Has Grant to Digitize Rare Magazines.” Brown University press release (April 19, 2007)
[46] Spence. Secret Agent 666, pp. 214-215.
[47] Crowley to Schneider October 5, 1944 GJY Collection, cited in Richard Kaczynski. Perdurabo: The Life of Aleister Crowley (North Atlantic Book, 2010) p. 448.
[48] Freud, cited in Ernest Jones. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (1964), p. 353.
[49] Spence. Secret Agent 666.
[50] “The Idea of Europe.” The Last Europeans. Retrieved from https://www.lasteuropeans.eu/en/jewish-perspectives-on-the-crises-of-an-idea/1-the-idea-of-europe/
[51] Mark Swartzburg. “The Three hundred,” in Richard S. Levy (ed.). Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution (Santa Babara, California; ABC-CLIO, 2005), p. 706.
[52] Mark Swartzburg. “The Three hundred,” in Richard S. Levy (ed.). Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution (Santa Babara, California; ABC-CLIO, 2005), p. 706.
[53] Jay Ticker. “Max I. Bodenheimer: Advocate of Pro-German Zionism at the Beginning of World War I.” Jewish Social Studies, 43:1 (Winter, 1981), p. 12.
[54] Klaus Polkehn. “Zionism and Kaiser Wilhelm.” Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Winter, 1975), p. 88.
[55] Ibid., p. 87.
[56] Stenographisches Protokoll der Verhandlungen des sechsten Zionisten-Kongresses (Vienna, 1903), p. 272. Cited in Bloom. Arthur Ruppin and the Production of Pre-Israeli Culture, p. 140.
[57] “Co-operation in Palestine.” New York Times (March 17, 1914). Retrieved from https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1914/03/17/101754909.pdf
[58] Sean McMeekin. The Berlin-Baghdad Express: The Ottoman Empire and Germany’s Bid for World Power (2010), p. 346.
[59] “Leo Motzkin (1867 - 1933).” Israel and Zionism. Department of Jewish Education. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20071113200527/http://www.jafi.org.il/education/100/people/BIOS/motzkin.html
[60] Etan Bloom. Arthur Ruppin and the Production of Pre-Israeli Culture. Studies in Jewish History and Culture. Vol. 31 (Brill, 2011), p. 148.
[61] Etan Bloom. Arthur Ruppin and the Production of Pre-Israeli Culture. Studies in Jewish History and Culture. Vol. 31 (Brill, 2011), pp. 86–88, 97–98.
[62] Tom Segev. “The Makings of History: Revisiting Arthur Ruppin.” Haaretz (October 8, 2009). Retrieved from https://www.haaretz.com/1.5309866
[63] Etan Bloom. Arthur Ruppin and the Production of Pre-Israeli Culture. Studies in Jewish History and Culture. Vol. 31 (Brill, 2011), pp. 86–88, 97–98.
[64] Steven E. Aschheim. Beyond the Border: The German-Jewish Legacy Abroad (Princeton University Press, 2018), p. 125, n.19.
[65] Cedric Cohen-Skalli & Libera Pisano. “Farewell to Revolution! Gustav Landauer’s Death and the Funerary Shaping of His Legacy.” The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 28: 2 (2020), p. 227, n. 123.
[66] Robbert-Jan Adriaansen. The Rhythm of Eternity: The German Youth Movement and the Experience of the Past, 1900-1933 (Berghahn Books, 2015), p. 13.
[67] Jason Ā. Josephson-Storm. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences (University of Chicago Press, 2017), p. 265.
[68] Jutta Neupert. “Wyneken, Gustav, Pädagoge.” In Benz, Wolfgang; Graml, Hermann (eds.). Biographisches Lexikon zur Weimarer Republik (Munich: C. H. Beck., 1988), p. 375.
[69] Ulfried Geuter. Homosexualität in der deutschen Jugendbewegung. Jugendfreundschaft und Sexualität im Diskurs von Jugendbewegung, Psychoanalyse und Jugendpsychologie am Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts (Frankfurt am Main 1994), p. 209 f.
[70] Hans Blüher. Wandervogel. Geschichte einer Jugendbewegung. Zweiter Teil: Blüte und Niedergang. Second edition (Berlin-Tempelhof, 1912), p. 114 f.
[71] Ofer Nordheimer Nur. Eros and Tragedy, Hashomer Hatzair: Jewish Male Fantasies and the Masculine Revolution of Zionism (Academic Studies Press, 2014), p. 35.
[72] Ofer Nordheimer Nur. Eros and Tragedy, Hashomer Hatzair: Jewish Male Fantasies and the Masculine Revolution of Zionism (Academic Studies Press, 2014), p. 142.
[73] Ibid., p. 167.
[74] Ibid., p. 180
[75] Ibid., p. 58.
[76] Petri Liukkonen. “Arthur Schnitzler.” Books and Writers (Finland: Kuusankoski Public Library). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20120206131904/http://kirjasto.sci.fi/schnitz.htm
[77] Roger Manvell & Heinrich Fraenkel. Doctor Goebbels: His Life and Death (New York: Skyhorse, 2010), p. 299.
[78] Curt Riess. Joseph Goebbels (London: Hollis and Carter, 1949), p. 9.
[79] Ibid., p. 16.
[80] Peter Longerich. Goebbels: A Biography (New York: Random House, 2015), p. 24.
[81] Ibid., pp. 72, 88.
[82] “Magda Goebbels’ biological father may have been Jewish.” Jewish Chronicle (August 21, 2016).
[83] Colin Shindler. The Hebrew Republic: Israel's Return to History (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017), pp. 46–47.
[84] Maurice Girodias. Une journée sur le terre (Éditions de la Différence, 1990), vol. I, p. 411.
[85] Frances Stonor Saunders. The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters (New York: The New Press, 1999), p. 8.
[86] Maria Popova. “The Greatest Books of All Time, as Voted by 125 Famous Authors.” The Atlantic (January 30, 2012).
[87] Vladimir Nabokov & Alfred Appel. The Annotated "Lolita" Revised and Updated (New York: Vintage, 1991), p. 16.
[88] Fiona Barnett. “Abuse Drawings.” fionabarnett.org (accessed January 31, 2018).
[89] Fiona Barnett. “Abuse survivor Fiona Barnett: The ‘Candy Girl’” Independent Australia (October 13, 2015).
[90] Steve McMurray. “MK-ULTRA in Australia: Part 6.” Project Millstone.
[91] Autobiographical Sketch by Eliot Slater, in Man, Mind and Heredity, ed. J. Shields and I. I. Gottesman (The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971).
[92] Volker Roelcke, Paul J.Weindling & Louise Westwood. Chapter 4: Germany and the Making of “English” Psychiatry: The Maudsley Hospital, 1908–1939. International Relations in Psychiatry: Britain, Germany, and the United States to World War II (Boydell & Brewer, University of Rochester Press, 2010); Weindling, Paul J. (2013). Baltic Eugenics: Bio-Politics, Race and Nation in Interwar Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 1918–1940, p. 3. Eliot Slater and the Institutionalization of Psychiatric Genetics in the United Kingdom, Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jWQgAgAAQBAJ
[93] Krishna R Dronamraju & Joseph Needham. If I Am To Be Remembered: Correspondence Of Julian Huxley (World Scientific, 1993), p. 270.
[94] Philip Trevelyan. Julian Trevelyan: Picture Language (Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2013), p. 84.
[95] “CIA funds research by Eysenck.” New Statesman (1979).
[96] O’Neill and Haupt. “Harry Bailey.”
[97] John O’Neill and Robert Haupt. “Harry Bailey: A Sadist Dressed Up As A Doctor, Or Just Insane?” Sydney Morning Herald (August 5, 1988).
[98] Horace Cheeves & Denise Nicole Cheeves. Legacy (Trafford Publishing, 2004), p. 234.
[99] ADOPTIONS: Crown St Style and a Case Study. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/
[100] O’Neill and Haupt. “Harry Bailey.”
[101] Steve McMurray. “MK-ULTRA in Australia: Part 3.” Project Millstone.
[102] Fiona Barnett. “Abuse survivor Fiona Barnett: The ‘Candy Girl’” Independent Australia (October 13, 2015).
[103] Calendar of the University of Sydney for the Year 1961. Retrieved from http://calendararchive.usyd.edu.au/Calendar/1961/1961.pdf
[104] Dan Spinelli. “Penn prof. ‘horrified’ life’s research is connected to CIA torture techniques.” The Daily Pennsylvanian (December 22, 2014).
[105] BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REFERENCES 1953 to 1998 THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Dr.Richard York and Barbara Allen (with modifications added by the Gittinger Assessment Center). Retrieved from https://www.pasf.org/print_bibliog.htm
Rockefellers Conceived BRICS in 1956 as NWO Ploy
Oct 31, 2024
Politics is a charade. Virtually all Canadian leaders are Freemasons, and this applies to the West [and thence the whole WORLD] in general.
Jerry said (July 2, 2023):
It is becoming so apparent that no matter what political party you are voting for..you are voting for Satan..whatever media you are following is owned by Satin..they think they won..far from it..they have an Achilles heel..in Canada, the average person does not understand or know in Canada as a nation we legally are allowed to issue our own interest-free, debt-free Canadian currency..as you have stated many times..hit them where they live..take away their control of our money..let’s rally for a sovereign Canadian dollar..they will drown like a slug covered in beer..they have nothing after that..except to end up in hell where they belong.
Al Thompson said (July 2, 2023):
The government is bad religion based on the occult. The results of the actions they take show the depravity of what they do. The chaos in France and the politics in Western nations are a result of the evil of government. It begins with the oaths. The government is a slave system supported by the religions; which in turn, make spiritual slaves of the unsuspecting. I was fooled by these people for years. Notice how none of the religions seem to be opposing the evil of the government; especially the Christians.
Only a focus on virtue and morality will get mankind out of this mess. Don’t look for a masonic government to fix anything. Whatever they do will make it worse. Freemasons are immoral and will destroy everything in their path.
Playing in the “new world order” will always get a bad result and the “new world order” will be destroyed by the natural world order.
https://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2020/12/swear-oath-receive-curse.html
Tell-Tale Subhuman SSickness of Cabbalists [of all sorts/ religious-and-other guises]:
!Psychopathic Warfare!
Always pretending to be in control.
Psychotic and delusional lying.
Childishly saying "no you" to ever person and thing that exposes them and then acting arrogant which includes everything exposing them here.
Constant slander and lying accusations.
Constant denial of their crimes.
Arrogant grinning to appear confident when they are really scared.
Blood drunken induced psychopathy.
Violence, torture, and murder.
Declaring themselves brilliant for acting like demented and violent liars.
Using sadistic, murderous, and cannibalistic women as a weapon.
Blood drunken praising of themselves.
Financing liars and slanderers.
Financing propagandists to dominate the internet.
Control the perception of "public opinion" through paid propagandists.
Claiming gang stalking is a democratic process. Organizing and ganging up on individuals in larger numbers and calling it democracy.
Gang stalkers acting like their victims are in a court room where the gang stalkers operate as the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, and jury.
Dictating lies with covert violence.
Calling the use of self defense against them "dictating lies with covert violence."
Psychotic insolence and terrorism.
Vandalism.
Electronic vandalism like hacking vehicles and electronics to cause them to break.
Electronic harassment.
Recruiting local gang stalkers who use electronic weapons.
Insolent and demented mockeries.
Censorship.
Framing people.
Stealing other peoples writings, claiming them as their own, and using them as bait to target people in a controlled environment.
Poisoning people.
Stalking.
Electronic spying.
Violently attacking people and then running away and calling the people who expose them false accusers. That is them violently attacking people and calling their victims false accusers. That is a form of gaslighting.
Using more violence to dictate their lies and false accusations.
Reverse psychology like the media pretending to be against Trump or Trump pretending to be against the media. The entire Trump psyop is using reverse psychology.
Political theater. Democratic and Republican shills covertly working together to spread division.
Divide and Conquer.
Republican cult members falsely accusing people of being liberal shills for exposing corrupt republican politicians
Democratic cult members falsely accusing people of being conservative shills for exposing corrupt democratic politicians.
Criminals arrogantly pretending they are in control. Fake omnipotence.
The weaker and more fearful they are the more they finance shills to defend them with boldness and arrogance. Fake omnipotence.
When they are scared they murder children.
Claiming they are gods or claiming god does not exist because they really do murder children and if "god" existed then he would stop them and this is all because the Creator expects good people to do something about it.
When these criminals get killed they retaliate by killing innocent people or children.
Charlie Sheen's tactic of saying the word "winning" over and over again which is what Trump and his QAnon cult members do.
Using the placebo effect to induce mindless arrogance when they are scared.
Attacking someone and claiming before they attack that person that their victim will react by exposing the ones attacking them and then the attackers claim to be all knowing. Part of their fake omnipotence and fake precognition.
Falsely accusing people of crimes they believe people are going to do in the future.
Pretending to "know what's going to happen."
Claiming that psychotic behaviors and insanity is genius.
Claiming that deep stupidity is genius.
Claiming that using violence and gang stalking is genius.
Making bold false claims. Bold lying.
Radiating vague one word spells at people.
Vague denial. Denial of information without debating any of the facts.
Them saying "NO YOU" to everything you say about them. "I know you are but what am I"
Evil people claiming that their evil associates are innocent. Defending each other.
Evil people trying to hijack opposition against evil like the Freemasons of 1776 or the alternative media that claims to oppose the NWO and then completely ignores those running the NWO.
Making lying accusations against people who really expose criminals.
Child murderers and pedophiles calling people that expose them false accusers.
Falsely accusing the victims usually of their crimes and usually only after they get called out first.
Claiming that if you are aware of evil then you are in on it. It is like saying if a woman was raped and then she exposed her rapist that because she had information on her rapist that she must have been in on it. They are really that insane and do claim this.
Calling people greedy for exposing their financial persecutors.
Calling people violent for using self defense.
Claiming that violence cannot be used against war criminals, gang stalkers, poisoners, pedophiles, child traffickers.
Promoting "Peaceful Protests" against murderers, war criminals, and lawless tyrants.
Claiming that pacifism against tyrants solves tyranny.
Claiming that exposing evil people is an act of violence.
Falsely accusing people of being trolls for calling out shills.
Shills spreading fear and threatening the destruction of society when they get exposed.
Gang stalkers making up the most insane lies like claiming they control the royals and nobles they work for.
Inverted witchcraft or engineered lies.
Reflective witchcraft or engineered lies.
Radiating doom spells on society and individuals.
Sabotaging a persons life through covert methods like poison, financial persecution, violating rights, violating privacy, electronic vandalism, slander, and also bribing or corrupting people and turning people around the victim into gang stalkers.
Christians threatening destruction on society and saying its because the Bible says so.
Christians claiming to own "belief in a creator."
Gang stalkers calling their victims "sinners."
Gang stalkers claiming that their gang stalking is "punishment from god."
Christians calling people Satanists for exposing Satanism in the Bible and Christianity.
Christians threatening society and telling people they will burn in hell if they don't bow down to Jesus.
Christians who are also gang stalkers and murderous cannibals calling themselves "sinners" and saying things like "only god can judge" for a false piety and fake humbleness.
Denial of self defense.
Demanding that people "love their enemies."
Claiming that killing an attacker in self defense is a sacrifice.
Claiming that defending your life is the same as the initial attacker. Someone assaults you so you fight back and then they claim both are equally guilty.
Ignoring context.
Distortion of context.
Ignoring motives.
Claiming that calling a fascist male bisexual rapist a "faggot" is homophobia and offensive. The correct definition of a faggot is a male bisexual rapist who rapes other men for control and most male members of the NWO are faggots.
Claiming that exposing racist cults of supremacists who target individuals of different races is racism.
Using gang stalkers and shills to attack people as distractions and as a defense for high level criminals.
Claiming that ignoring the annoying low level shills and gang stalkers means the low level gang stalkers control a person because they are not focusing on them.
Child murderers and murderous cannibals claiming that naming and exposing them is the most evil thing there is.
Attempting to hijack facts and truth by agreeing with it and then mix the truth with lies and completely made up information.
Trolls latching onto people who expose evil as an attempt to make the legitimate person seem like they are associated with trolls.
Known liars agreeing with truth to make the truth seem like a lie as a form of reverse psychology through a fake association.
Demanding proof while completely ignoring existing evidence and proof.
Claiming that evil people are in prison when they are not.
Falsely accusing people of being false accusers for exposing criminals that other criminals claim are dead and or in prison when they are not. They are this insane.
Dictating their fantasy world and delusions onto others.
Acting demented, childish, and insolent to annoy or enrage people.
Claiming that exposing gang stalkers is gang stalking.
Claiming individuals who expose gang stalkers is gang stalking and completely ignoring the meaning of the words "gang" and "individual"
Claiming that exposing the murderous gang stalkers is a "murderous plot against them"
Pretending they are brainwashed.
Claiming that women cannot be evil.
Gang stalkers claiming that only wealthy or famous people can be evil.
Calling a person a false accuser and basing it on their claim that they are "possessed" and therefore innocent of their evil actions.
Claiming they don't have to pay back for damage and thefts they caused or did while they are "demonically possessed" and then saying they have "repented."
Claiming that taking a vacation from gang stalking is "repentance."
Blaming evil technologies for gang stalking.
Falsely accusing people of being Jews for not generalizing and blaming all Jews.
Blaming "Satan" for everything evil.
Blaming "Sorcerers" for gang stalking.
Claiming its "supernatural" and claiming there is nothing that can be done to combat it.
Christians saying that their god and Jesus will take care of the evil. Spreading apathy.
The moment the Black Nobility get scared they finance thousands of YouTube shills that blame all Jews for all evils and if you don't agree they claim you work for Jews.
Claiming "life is an illusion."
There was something so incongruous about the sight of King Felipe of Spain, mud-splattered by raging elements of a crowd in Paiporta, a suburb of Valencia. It’s a timeless royal tradition, to take a walkabout through a fresh disaster. It’s meant to show empathy and leadership, and ideally something even more profound: a togetherness of nationhood that transcends any gulf of status. It’s meant to be healing.
It does, however, require from the public a hell of a lot of deference, to overlook certain things: for instance, that your home is destroyed, you have no food or nappies, and this guy in his pristine shirt and cargo pants will shortly get back in his SUV and go home to his dry and exquisitely appointed quarters. You’d have to avoid asking questions such as: how much is this helping? Wouldn’t it have been preferable to have had some warning of the floods, rather than commiseration afterwards? Is it too soon for a ceremonial visit, when weather warnings are still in place and possibly up to 2,000 people are still unaccounted for? But is it also too late, as one resident shouted: “It’s been four days – where have you been? You’ve just come here to pose for pictures. You have no shame!”
Wealth itself is a gruesome sight, when everything you had has been reduced to rubble. “You lack for nothing, while we here don’t even have water to drink,” another resident shouted at Queen Letizia.
Arguably, the royals coped better with the fury than the prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, who had to cut his own visit short after his entourage was pelted with stones. Yet the king and queen aborted their trip to the next village, Chiva. They were both too late and too soon, and their affluence was an insult. As ambiently popular as they are in Spain, the only right time to be royal now is when nothing bad has happened.
The Windsors are faced with a similar conundrum, from a different direction: an investigation by Channel 4’s Dispatches and the Sunday Times has revealed the rents charged by the duchies of Cornwall (Prince William’s) and Lancaster (King Charles’s) – in the forms of a £37.5m agreement with the Ministry of Justice to lease Dartmoor prison, and an £11.4m deal with Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS trust to rent a London warehouse over 15 years to store ambulances. The Ministry of Defence rents mooring space for warships; one local authority has to pay for access to a toll bridge.
Other questions about the carbon footprint of their property empires and the rate of tax they pay are second-order, really: because the right amount of rent to charge a hospital trust to house its ambulances (if you claim to put duty to your nation above all things, love your subjects, have more money than you could ever spend, and – let’s be real – no use of your own to make of that warehouse, given that you already have loads of houses and no personal ambulances) is zero. If they want to be the family they say they are – which is to say, metaphorically connected to the rest of us as if by blood – they should share their stuff.
The fundamental contradiction of hoarding land and wealth on the one hand, yet modelling ultimate patriotism on the other, was historically resolved by deference. Nobody would have even asked George VI how much he was charging the Ministry of Defence during the blitz, and they definitely wouldn’t have thrown anything at him as he visited the fresh ruins of Coventry. As that reflexive subservience has seeped away, the relationship has become much more precarious: our royals survive with their popularity intact only when nobody looks directly at them. Any detail, whether it’s Prince Andrew’s Royal Lodge-squatting or Prince William’s rent-seeking, has become sharp enough to sever the bonds that tied us all together.
Which brings up the question of whether the concept of a “figurehead” can function, in an age where his or her safest bet is to be unobtrusive. Do royals, everywhere, need to fashion a new role? Or is it possible that mature democracies are finally done with this phase of the constitutional journey?
So here we are. Kemi Badenoch is the leader of the Conservative party. That’s another couple of firsts that the Tories have beaten Labour to. So far, the Conservatives have elected the first Asian leader and prime minister, and the first female Black leader of any major British political party.
But as these firsts started to come quicker and closer together – we now have a brown party leader handing over to a Black one – two things have happened. One, the politics of the party has become more unhinged and its electoral record has tanked. And two, the profile of these mould-breaking new leaders has become more extreme. The two are not unrelated to the success of ethnic minorities in the Tory party. I am sorry to point this out, because there is a sort of ritual now that must be observed when the Tories do well on diversity: you must not speak ill of a person of colour who has been elected to a position of leadership for the first time, and the significance of that moment, above all else, should be respected.
That ritual now has become a sort of farce. Because many things are staring us in the face while we are asked to perform some perfunctory ceremony of celebration. The ritual now even has its own incantation: “putting politics aside” or “whatever you think of their politics”, you must say, we must recognise that this is a good day for British politics and society in general. I’m not clear how you can “put politics aside” when it’s Badenoch’s actual job, and when her record is so appalling. I mean, it’s Kemi Badenoch. And her job is leader of the opposition.
This is the woman who said that “not all cultures are equally valid”, when deciding on who is to be allowed to enter the UK. Who said that autistic people undeservingly receive “better treatment” and economic “privileges and protections”. Who thinks that maternity pay is “excessive”. That online safety regulation is “legislating for hurt feelings” and that net zero commitments are “unilateral economic disarmament”. And who has dedicated much of her career so far to pugnacious culture warring.
And if you were to just take a glance at what her elevation means to the ethnic minority from which she comes, I am afraid that there is not only little to celebrate, but a lot to worry about. Take Badenoch on colonialism (she doesn’t care about it); on Black communities (she thinks no such thing exists, a neat echo of Thatcher’s “no such thing as society”); and on racism (when Black people are in the wrong job, in her experience, they just think their employer is racist).
But you must park whatever you think of that, and acknowledge that this is a good day because it says something about diminishing barriers to the rise of people of colour today. What that obscures is the specific circumstances of that rise, and of which people in particular. It’s not just anyone who gets to the top in British politics, but those who adhere to a particular story – one in which their experience, success and racial identity allow them to undermine the concerns of other ethnic minorities and attack those minorities for not toeing the line in terms of their “integration” or political values. (Badenoch says that “ancestral hostilities” make some immigrants “hate Israel”.) It seems that successful candidates, because of their identity, can do the wider work of Conservatism when it comes to race in a way that their white counterparts are not able to without annihilating the veneer of respectability that distinguishes the Conservatives from the far right.
And the circumstances are also troubling. Kemi Badenoch, like Rishi Sunak, ran before as party leader and was dismissed out of hand. And like Sunak, she was only considered when the party’s prospects had dwindled. It’s an awkward question and again I am sorry to pose it while we are in the customary grace period of putting politics aside, but does there not seem to be a correlation between electing ethnic minorities as party heads, and a recent deterioration of the party’s performance internally and at the ballot box? The implication is that when the party is not really in serious play, it can afford to experiment with new people who wouldn’t have been quite the right profile in more bountiful times, and see where it goes.
It’s a lot to reckon with, I know, when there is a far simpler moment to land on, a far simpler story of racial success to grasp on to. If you had told me 10 years ago that we would have a brown prime minister and a Black female leader of the Tory party, I would have imagined a far less flat and dispiriting scenario. The Tories’ record on elevating problematic people of colour has accelerated quicker than society’s understanding that people of colour can be problematic too – and that it’s OK to say so. The party’s degrading effect on social cohesion over the past decade is far too clear now for any of us not to realise that this is the way the status quo works. Its very power lies in constantly expanding the profile of people included in the establishment so that they may stabilise it, by diversifying it.
Badenoch has the right to have whatever opinions she wishes, but it is also the right of others to feel excluded by them, and not be scolded for refusing to cheer an appointment that is at best meaningless, and at worst perturbing.
Badenoch’s election is a first that signifies nothing. But it is useful, because it forces us to confront the fact that representation does not happen simply by elevating women or people of colour. True representation requires specific people and specific circumstances that do something other than merely continuing, or indeed entrenching, the way things already are. It’s a curveball for sure. But we can catch it. And catch up.
Nation’s Impish Swing Voters Announce They Have Little Surprise In Store
America Defeats America
They make nice with him when it suits, ridicule him when he’s not listening. Their lives are money and gossip – with him they get both
During his term as US president, there was an established routine to Donald Trump’s evenings in public service. When he got into bed at 6.30pm with the big cheeseburger and the bucket of Diet Coke – boudoir TVs set to “channels talking about me” – Trump liked nothing more than yakking on the phone to this billionaire or that. He whined, he bitched, he divulged, and when they finally ended the call, whichever billionaire had been on the other end of the line promptly called one of the other billionaires to laugh about it all behind his back.
“What a fucking idiot,” Rupert Murdoch once remarked after getting off a call with Trump in which Murdoch had had to explain that actually, the Silicon Valley elite did not “need” Trump’s help, as he imagined, having just enjoyed eight years where they “practically ran” the Obama administration. Obviously, Murdoch’s a notorious bitch; almost the Regina George of it all. But – also obviously – he was one of the special guys officially given “cleared caller” status in Trump’s White House, meaning they could get through to him any time. Plastics gotta plastic.
So yes – much as I am enjoying all the miles of complex in-depth coverage wondering what it is the current crop of Trump-backing billionaires want from him, I can’t help being reminded of a remark by the tech billionaire in Succession who is attempting to buy into American power and is attending a pre-election party. “I thought these people would be very complicated,” he reflects. “But they’re not. It’s basically just money and gossip.” “Oh yeah, that’s all there is,” comes the reply. “Money and gossip.”
Kamala Harris has more billionaires backing her, we keep hearing in news I think is supposed to be a matter of accomplishment for the vice-president. But the particular billionaires pulling for Trump stand on the potential threshold of huge money-and-gossip times. Among the mogul class’s truths-universally-acknowledged is the idea that money is best obtained via deregulation and tax cuts – and, in the case of, say, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, ever-more lucrative government contracts. As for how gossip is obtained … People say showbiz is mean and gossipy, but there really is no business as mean and gossipy as “mogul”. Money does not buy you happiness but it totally buys you a better quality of gossip, with the likes of Murdoch, Bezos, Steve Wynn, Stephen Schwarzman and all the others operating at an absolute weapons-grade level.
The gossip-money continuum is sort of everything to these guys, and most of them see Trump as their useful idiot. Or useful fucking idiot, in Murdoch’s case. Consider Nelson Peltz, the infamous activist investor (who British people may know as the father-in-law of would-be hot sauce mogul Brooklyn Beckham). Three years ago, Nelson was telling everyone that Trump would carry the disgrace of the 6 January insurrection for ever. “We had people shooting at each other in Congress,” Peltz fumed. “I mean, it’s beyond belief. And how could you say that is anything but his legacy?” Oh but you could, it turns out. In fact, by early this year, Nelson could be found throwing wildly lucrative fundraisers for Trump at his home. And why not? All manner of things could be in it for him. Peltz spent a chunk of Trump’s first term covertly trying to push him to launch an antitrust investigation into Amazon on account of its effect on the US Postal Service. Trump didn’t go that far that time, but he did launch a number of aggressive tweets about it. And rest assured, meanwhile, that the Amazon founder, Bezos, will have bitched a lot on the phone about that. Everybody’s always talking about everybody, in the in-crowd.
Why would you ever want to cast yourself out of this high-rollers circle jerk by appearing to have a principle or – even worse – allowing the help at one of your most junior businesses to appear to have one? In fact, speaking of Bezos, take his insistence last week that his Washington Post forego its traditional candidate endorsement editorial, a decision which has thus far seen members of its editorial board resign and caused a reported 250,000 readers to cancel their subscriptions.
Or take Howard Lutnick, the Cantor Fitzgerald CEO, who is moonlighting as a senior official on Trump’s campaign, and who recently floated the idea that all government appointees to any pending Trump administration would have to prove “fidelity and loyalty” to him. Hey – Howard’s just saying whatever needs to be said to stay in the loopy-loop. It’s not like government workers are going to be making any of the decisions anyway.
The only billionaire who doesn’t quite fit in the gang is Elon Musk. My gut says the other billionaires are not at all sure about Musk. At the Allen & Co Sun Valley conference, that annual retreat for the point-nought-nought-nought-nought-nought per cent, you suspect none of them would like to get stuck in the barefoot yurt with Elon. He’s weird, he’s creepy (but not in the Monty Burns way they’ve all legitimised), and – this is the worst part – he comes off like he might somehow take their money. Not clear how, just … vibes. His billionaire vibes are off. I would kill to hear what they say about him in the mogul phone call circle. At the very least I expect Elon to one day make an aggressive attempt to acquire WhatsApp off Mark Zuckerberg, purely so he can read all their messages slagging him off.
In the meantime, as the election bears down on the US and the wider world, we must while away our time wondering why these extremely transactional mega-rich men back this other extremely transactional mega-rich man. It would be lovely, come Wednesday morning, not to have to put one’s finger on it.
Trump has pledged to wage war on planet Earth – and it will take a progressive revolution to stop him
We were losing slowly. Now we are losing quickly. Democracy, accountability, human rights, social justice – all were rolling backwards as money swarmed our politics. Above all, our life-support systems – the Earth’s atmosphere, oceans, ecosystems, ice and snow – have been hammered and hammered, regardless of who is in power. Donald Trump might strike the killer blows, but he is not the cause of an ecocidal economic system. He is the embodiment of it.
Under Joe Biden, the US was missing its own climate goals, and those goals were insufficient to meet the global objective of limiting heating to 1.5C above preindustrial levels. That target in turn might not be tight enough to prevent a tipping of Earth systems. Already, at roughly 1.3C of heating, we see what looks alarmingly like climatic flickering: the ever wilder perturbations that tend to precede the collapse of a complex system.
Trump has pledged to wage war on planet Earth, ripping up US climate commitments and reverting to unrestrained fossil fuel extraction and burning. If he follows the Project 2025 agenda, he will leave the UN climate framework altogether, making his assault on Earth systems much harder to reverse.
His evangelical base, eager to advance the biblical apocalypse, will love him for it. Most simply deny climate breakdown. Others perceive events such as floods and fires not as warnings, but as joyous portents of the end of times: a great cleansing, in which the righteous will be uplifted to sit at the right hand of God, while their enemies will be cast into the fiery pit. What we will see under a new Trump presidency is a neat alignment of the interests of fossil fuel companies and a constituency gunning for Armageddon (and hoping that Benjamin Netanyahu will assist its delivery).
But let’s not forget: the greatest predicament that humanity has ever faced scarcely featured in this election campaign. If Trump mentioned it, it was to denounce climate breakdown as “one of the great scams of all time”, while Kamala Harris was almost silent on the issue. Perhaps that’s unsurprising, when both candidates relied so heavily on billionaire funding. Capital is always hostile to restraint, and effective environmental policy would be the greatest restraint of all.
On almost all fronts, decency and humanity have been retreating for years. Genocide, colonial conquest, the seizure of resources from the poor: all are resurgent, even before Trump returns to the White House. The rich have learned how to game our political systems. Capital has found the means of solving its longstanding problem: democracy.
Trump’s conquest of the US is widely seen as something new. But it looks to me like a reversion to the default state of centralised, hierarchical societies. For many centuries, these societies were characterised by extreme power vested in the leader. This power was brokered by a favoured caste, which drew on a justifying belief in the inherent superiority of some groups over others. This caste was empowered to treat other people’s lives as disposable, to criminalise dissent and inflict extreme violence and cruelty upon those who challenged the leader or his ideology. Instead of rational argument, it used symbols, slogans, ceremony and pageantry to reinforce power and create social consensus.
A centralised democratic system was always a contradiction. However enlightened the founding fathers of the US (or the liberal reformers in the UK) may have seemed, they created systems in which elite power would never fully relinquish control. These systems were highly vulnerable to capture and reversal. Only a far more decentralised, participatory democracy could resist the reversion to autocratic rule.
We have laboured for years under a folk theory of democracy: to win power, you must “make the case” for the politics you want to see, using reasoned argument. Voters will assess the competing arguments. On this basis, and considering the records of the candidates, they will decide which of the factions operating from a distant centre they will elect to govern them for the next four or five years. Then they will trust those representatives to act on their behalf until the next election, on the basis of presumed consent. It was always a fairytale.
People seek to destroy what they feel excluded from. Centralised “democracies” exclude all but a rarefied circle from genuine power. Disempowered people tend to be profoundly unimpressed by “rational arguments” for this faction or that one: they have an entirely reasonable desire – however unreasonable its expression may be – to kick the system over. There are constructive ways of doing so, and destructive ways. The majority of US voters have now chosen the destructive path. The message of Trump’s victory seems clear: to hell with your reasoned arguments. Give us reassuring homilies and blood sacrifice.
Trump could still be reined in by the midterm elections, but his appointments to the supreme court and its reciprocal grant of almost full-spectrum immunity will enable him to rule in some respects without restraint. In some ways, he can exercise greater power than medieval monarchs could have dreamed of, as the inequality of arms between state and citizens has grown massively in the “democratic” era.
Sophisticated propaganda on new media channels, surveillance technologies, new means of crowd control, targeted assassination: as we have seen in other countries, these can be used to snuff out dissent with horrifying efficiency. When I saw the mini drones being used by the Russian government to drop grenades on individual citizens in the Ukrainian city of Kherson, I thought: one day, that could be any of us.
Monstrous as he is, Trump is no outlier. He is the distillation of capitalist pseudo-democracy. His values, entirely extrinsic – fixated on prestige, status, image, fame, power and wealth – are the dominant values projected for years on to every screen and into every mind. His criminality is the system’s criminality. His abuse of women, of staff, of customers, of Muslims, of immigrants, of disabled people, of ecosystems, is the abuse the majority of the world’s people have suffered for centuries.
What do we do? Stop it from happening in our own countries. This, I believe, requires a massive decentralisation, a devolution of politics to the people, the creation of a genuine democracy that cannot so easily be captured, the building of an ecological civilisation that subordinates economics to Earth systems, not the other way round. No one would claim any of this is easy. But right now, we are readily handing our lives to the Donald Trumps that lurk in every country.
,%20they%20Will%20Be%20Exposed%20and%20Punished%20to%20Death%20(everywhere%20in%20the%20world)%20now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.png)
,%20they%20Will%20Be%20Exposed%20and%20Punished%20to%20Death%20(everywhere%20in%20the%20world)%20now%2048!!.png)
SSadistic SShills and Media !! (A Perishworthy World of Fakes/ Narcissists/ Psychopaths/ pedoSSods/ Subhumans/ Liars/ Fakes/ Murderers/ Lowlives/ SScum & SSludge That Should've Never Been Born!!)
ALL Fraud Will Be Unveiled To The Whole World And Punished With KARMA!!
The scope of this blogpost can be substantiated, evidenced and expounded infinitely when reviewed in light of the excellent wealth of information and documentation contained in:
and
Spies, informants and new enemies - Today’s intelligence agencies | DW Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX6xMrTJRCo
Spy Cables reveal Israel’s Mossad tactics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDy7y-GVdu8
Human Rights Abuses in Saudi Arabia with Joey Shea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au-EH14Ed3c
https://humanmelodysustained.blogspot.com/2024/04/scientology-ssick-criminal-illuminati.html (All bogposts, esp. the recent months', apply)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Gangstalking/comments/bkutvj/is_this_happening_in_turkey_china_switzerland/
https://books.google.com.sa/books?id=vgP0EAAAQBAJ&pg=PT235&lpg=PT235&dq=gangstalking+in+saudi+arabia&source=bl&ots=Usft_E0GDt&sig=ACfU3U36MVnnSme-nP7d0Llt6SXIrPZbMg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjduvP36p2GAxXAnf0HHSI3Bi4Q6AF6BAgrEAM#v=onepage&q=gangstalking%20in%20saudi%20arabia&f=false
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3-0LC-yCL8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhpf_cOemAw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hLjuVyIIrs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY3V8FC3VHs
https://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2024/05/palestinian-refugees.html
https://henrymakow.com/001523.html
https://gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/more-on-jewish-gang-stalking/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-01/saudi-arabia-steps-up-gaza-arrests-as-israel-ties-edge-closer
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/saudi-arabia-human-rights-raif-badawi-king-salman
https://archive.org/details/pedophila-empire-satan-sodomy-the-usa-deep-state-cia-epstein-biden-and-hollywood-joachim-hagopian/mode/2up
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/02/middleeast/saudi-drug-capital-mime-intl/index.html
https://www.emro.who.int/emhj-volume-15-2009/volume-15-issue-5/wife-abuse-a-hidden-problem-a-study-among-saudi-women-attending-phc-centres.html
https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/10/26/saudi-arabia-needs-more-transparent-justice-system
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informant-global-datamining
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/21/israeli-soldiers-and-police-tipping-off-groups-that-attack-gaza-aid-trucks
https://www.arabnews.com/saudi-arabia/news/899996
https://saudigazette.com.sa/article/170411
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/13/795952989/doj-says-21-saudi-trainees-being-expelled-from-u-s-over-jihadist-child-porn
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10611-021-09943-4#:~:text=As%20Islam%20is%20associated%20with,expense%20to%20combat%20this%20issue.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33994666/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnJa7wWS74E
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20220906-jinns-and-glass-palaces-how-saudis-dystopian-desert-city-borders-on-the-occult/
https://soundcloud.com/mirwais-rahimi-737968388/satanic-ritual-in-saudi-arabia
https://ordoabchao.ca/articles/nation-of-islam-and-the-freemasons
https://ordoabchao.ca/articles/2002-iraqi-intel-reported-wahhabis-are-of-jewish-origin
https://ordoabchao.ca/articles/modern-saudi-arabia-and-the-era-of-post-wahhabism
https://ordoabchao.ca/articles/isreal-created-hamas
https://ordoabchao.ca/articles/psychedelics-and-fascism-from-mk-ultra-to-esalen-and-silicon-valley
https://henrymakow.com/2024/05/fozdyke-sheeple-headed-for-slaughter.html
https://henrymakow.com/2024/05/mike-stone--humanity-despises-truth.html
No comments:
Post a Comment