HARM ... in a rotten/lowlife world of false savio[u]rs/ dajjals!!

WHO HARM

https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/fbi-big-tech-big-media-partners-in-collusion/

INTENTIONAL IGNORANCE 

“We know with certainty that electromagnetic hypersensitivity is not psychosomatic. EMFs provoke major effects in the brain. The most important of these is the opening of the blood− brain barrier."

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Migraine Brain Changes

Neuroscience - November 23, 2022

Summary: A new neuroimaging study identifies migraine sufferers have enlarged perivascular spaces in a brain region called the centrum semiovale.

Source: RSNA

For the first time, a new study has identified enlarged perivascular spaces in the brains of migraine sufferers.

Results of the study will be presented next week at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).

“In people with chronic migraine and episodic migraine without aura, there are significant changes in the perivascular spaces of a brain region called the centrum semiovale,” said study co-author Wilson Xu, an M.D. candidate at Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. “These changes have never been reported before.”

Migraine is a common, often debilitating condition, involving a severe recurring headache. Migraines may also cause nausea, weakness and light sensitivity. According to the American Migraine Foundation, over 37 million people in the U.S. are affected by migraine, and up to 148 million people worldwide suffer from chronic migraine.

Perivascular spaces are fluid-filled spaces surrounding blood vessels in the brain. They are most commonly located in the basal ganglia and white matter of the cerebrum, and along the optic tract.

Perivascular spaces are affected by several factors, including abnormalities at the blood-brain barrier and inflammation. Enlarged perivascular spaces can be a signal of underlying small vessel disease.

“Perivascular spaces are part of a fluid clearance system in the brain,” Xu said. “Studying how they contribute to migraine could help us better understand the complexities of how migraines occur.”

Xu and colleagues set out to determine the association between migraine and enlarged perivascular spaces. The researchers used ultra-high-field 7T MRI to compare structural microvascular changes in different types of migraine.

“To our knowledge, this is first study using ultra-high-resolution MRI to study microvascular changes in the brain due to migraine, particularly in perivascular spaces,” Xu said.

“Because 7T MRI is able to create images of the brain with much higher resolution and better quality than other MRI types, it can be used to demonstrate much smaller changes that happen in brain tissue after a migraine.”

Study participants included 10 with chronic migraine, 10 with episodic migraine without aura, and five age-matched healthy controls. All patients were between 25 and 60 years old. Patients with overt cognitive impairment, brain tumor, prior intracranial surgery, MRI contraindications and claustrophobia were excluded from the study.

The researchers calculated enlarged perivascular spaces in the centrum semiovale (central area of white matter) and basal ganglia areas of the brain. White matter hyperintensities—lesions that “light up” on MRI—were measured using the Fazekas scale.

Cerebral microbleeds were rated with the microbleed anatomical rating scale. The researchers also collected clinical data such as disease duration and severity, symptoms at time of scan, presence of aura and side of headache.

Statistical analysis revealed that the number of enlarged perivascular spaces in the centrum semiovale was significantly higher in patients with migraine compared to healthy controls. In addition, enlarged perivascular space quantity in the centrum semiovale correlated with deep white matter hyperintensity severity in migraine patients.

“We studied chronic migraine and episodic migraine without aura and found that, for both types of migraine, perivascular spaces were bigger in the centrum semiovale,” Xu said.

(A) Cerebral microbleeds (CMB) visualized as round, dark lesions (arrow) on SWI sequence in the left temporal lobe in a migraine case with aura. (B) Asymmetry in the appearance of the cortical vessels is more prominent on the left side (arrow) ipsilateral to the CMB. Credit: RSNA and Wilson Xu

“Although we didn’t find any significant changes in the severity of white matter lesions in patients with and without migraine, these white matter lesions were significantly linked to the presence of enlarged perivascular spaces. This suggests that changes in perivascular spaces could lead to future development of more white matter lesions.”

The researchers hypothesize that significant differences in the perivascular spaces in patients with migraine compared to the healthy controls might be suggestive of glymphatic disruption within the brain.

The glymphatic system is a waste clearance system that utilizes perivascular channels to help eliminate soluble proteins and metabolites from the central nervous system.

However, whether such changes affect migraine development or result from migraine is unknown. Continued study with larger case populations and longitudinal follow-up will better establish the relationship between structural changes and migraine development and type.

“The results of our study could help inspire future, larger-scale studies to continue investigating how changes in the brain’s microscopic vessels and blood supply contribute to different migraine types,” Xu said. “Eventually, this could help us develop new, personalized ways to diagnose and treat migraine.”

Co-authors are Brendon Chou, Giuseppe Barisano, Raymond Huang, Soniya Pinto, M.D., Daniel Chang Phung, M.D., Soma Sahai-Srivastava, Alexander Lerner, M.D., and Nasim Sheikh Bahaei, M.D., FRCR.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Pharma Death Clock!

Biiig [Kabbalist-Nazi CRIMINAL] Pharma's [and Kabbalist-Nazi-mASSonic Medical Mafia's] Chemical Warfare on Humanity ... dwarfs the number of victims killed by all world wars and all acts of terrorism combined ...

while drug companies profit billions!

https://pharmadeathclock.com/

Lucifer's Sad Little "Big Idea" of "Simulated Reality" [/Occultry] Will Hereon Be [Embarrasingly] Exposed and Thence Destroyed!

 

Lucifer's Sad Little "Big Idea" of "Simulated Reality" [/ Entirely Evil Occultry] Will Hereon Be [Embarrasingly] Exposed and Thence Destroyed!

Could the universe be an elaborate game constructed by bored aliens?

 Illustration: Elia Barbieri

Steven Poole

Mon 8 Aug 2022 12.30 BST

447

Elon Musk thinks you don’t exist. But it’s nothing personal: he thinks he doesn’t exist either. At least, not in the normal sense of existing. Instead we are just immaterial software constructs running on a gigantic alien computer simulation. Musk has stated that the odds are billions to one that we are actually living in “base reality”, ie the physical universe. At the end of last year, he responded to a tweet about the anniversary of the crude tennis video game Pong (1972) by writing: “49 years later, games are photo-realistic 3D worlds. What does that trend continuing imply about our reality?”

This idea is surprisingly popular among philosophers and even some scientists. Its modern version is based on a seminal 2003 paper, Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? by the Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom. Assume, he says, that in the far future, civilisations hugely more technically advanced than ours will be interested in running “ancestor simulations” of the sentient beings in their distant galactic past. If so, there will one day be many more simulated minds than real minds. Therefore you should be very surprised if you are actually one of the few real minds in existence rather than one of the trillions of simulated minds.

This idea has a long history in philosophical scepticism (the idea that we can’t know anything for sure about the external world) and other traditions. The Chinese Taoist sage Zhuangzi wrote a celebrated fable about a man who couldn’t be sure whether he was a man dreaming of being a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming of being a man. René Descartes imagined that he might be being manipulated by an “evil demon” (or “evil genius”) that controlled all the sensations he experienced, while the 20th-century American philosopher Hilary Putnam coined the term “brain in a vat” to describe a similar idea. But while Neo in the Wachowskis’ 1999 film The Matrix really is a brain (or rather a whole depilated body) in a vat, the simulation hypothesis says that you do not have a physical body anywhere. “You” are merely the result of mathematical calculations in some vast computer.

There might may be clues to the fact that our universe is a simulation hidden in the very fabric of ‘reality’

There are many possible objections to this idea even getting off the ground, as Bostrom notes. Perhaps it is simply not possible for computer-simulated beings to become conscious in the way we are. (This would defeat the “assumption of substrate independence”, according to which minds are not dependent on biological matter.) Or perhaps all civilisations destroy themselves before getting to the simulation stage. (Plausible if not necessarily comforting.) Or perhaps advanced civilisations are simply not interested in running such simulations, which would be surprising given the kinds of things humans do – such as developing video deep-fake technology or researching how to make viruses more virulent – even though they seem to be very bad ideas.

The simulation hypothesis is perhaps attractive to a wider culture because of its nature as a cosmic-scale conspiracy theory as well as an apparently scientific version of Creationism. The inconceivably advanced alien running its simulation of our universe is indistinguishable from traditional terrestrial ideas of God: an all-powerful being who designed everything we see. But is this god the god of deism (who sets up the laws of nature but then absents himself while creation runs its course), or a more interventionist figure? If the latter, it might make sense to court their favour.

How, though, should we please such a god? Not necessarily by being virtuous, but by being – assuming the simulator is watching us for its own pleasure – at least entertaining. This line of reasoning might imply, for example, that it is one’s duty to become a florid serial killer, or a guy who tries to colonise Mars and buy Twitter. “Be funny, outrageous, violent, sexy, strange, pathetic, heroic … in a word ‘dramatic’,” counsels the economist Robin Hanson, considering that assumption in his 2001 paper How to Live in a Simulation . “If you might be living in a simulation then all else equal it seems that you should care less about others,” he concludes, and “live more for today”.

One commonly despairing reaction to the idea that we might all be simulated is that this renders our lives meaningless, and that nothing we see or experience is “real”. The Australian philosopher David Chalmers, in his recent book Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy, argues otherwise. For him, a digital table in VR is a real table. It is no more disqualified from being “real” by the fact that it is, at bottom, made up of digital ones and zeros than a physical table is disqualified from being real by the fact that it is, at bottom, made up of quantum wave-packets. Indeed, some esoteric theories of physics consider “reality” itself to be at base quantum-computational or mathematical in nature anyway.

The big idea: should we be using data to make life’s big decisions?

Read more

Is there any good reason to actually believe the simulation argument, though? Or is it just aesthetically piquant techno-religion? Chalmers observes that it is at least more plausible than earlier iterations of scepticism such as Descartes’s evil demon, simply because we now have functioning prototypes (video games, VR) of how such a simulation might work. Others have speculated that there may be clues to the fact that our universe is a simulation hidden in the very fabric of the “reality” that we can investigate: perhaps the simulation cuts corners at very small scales or very high energies. Indeed, experiments (for instance in Campbell et al., “On Testing the Simulation Theory”, 2017) have been seriously proposed that might reveal the answer.

But not so fast. Remember that we can’t know what the goal of the simulators is. Perhaps, for them, the game is not merely to observe us as an indefinite planet‑sized soap opera, but simply to see how long the sim-people take to prove that they’re in a simulation. At which point, the game ends and the simulation is turned off. Perhaps we’re better off not finding out.

(Related Fantasies of Lucifer "Science": 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-we-live-in-a-simulation-chances-are-about-50-50/) 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Actual [Vile, Covert, Murderous] Reality behind Such Sad Little "Big Idea" Fantasies of Lucifer's "Simulated Reality" ... 

World Health Organization: setting the standard for a wireless world of harm

A document by Olga Sheean regarding the special interests behind WHO’s wireless safety standards.

Excerpt from pdf: Lentegeur Cape Town South Africa

Broken-hearted.

My name is Amanda Collins and I live with my 12-year-old daughter Skyla
[pictured in the pdf] in Lentegeur —a suburb on the outskirts of Cape Town. Aged
four, Skyla was diagnosed with autism and ADD and attends a ‘special needs’
school. Since the installation of a cell tower, 10 metres from our home, around
a year ago, I have noticed a complete change in Skyla’s demeanour. She has
retracted back into the shell she was starting to escape from and become quiet,
introverted and rarely initiates conversations.
My heart is broken as I do not know how to help my daughter. I too am suffering and have learnt to live with buzzing in my ears, difficulty falling asleep at night, as well as regular headaches. I now keep a supply of pain pills on hand.
My crowning glory used to be my hair, which was thick, straight and shiny. Today, I hardly recognize myself in the mirror as my hair has become wiry and dry.
Under Apartheid, my community was disenfranchised. It is how I feel once again today!

—Amanda Collins, Cape Town, South Africa.

Olga Sheaan’s document asks:

What kind of world…?

…puts profit before people, the planet and prosperity?
…rejects the kind of science that makes sense of our biology and keeps us safe?
…forces young schoolchildren to be exposed to high levels of microwave radiation?
…penalizes teachers for trying to protect themselves/their students from WiFi radiation?
…dismisses the physical suffering of millions of global citizens with microwave sickness?
…has governments that refuse to acknowledge or talk to their constituents about the wireless technology deployed without their consent and without limits, monitoring or control?
…employs industry-biased/-funded ‘experts’ to downplay the dangers of wireless technology?
…fails to advise the public of the dangers identified by the telecoms industry itself?
What kind of World Health Organization condones worldwide harm in favour of industry?

The pdf is available at this link:

WHO Harm

https://www.bitchute.com/video/qwNhZS3hqNez/